2. Korematsu v. United States stands as one of the lowest points in Supreme Court history. Japanese American living in San Leandro, California. Subsequently, the Western Defense Command, a U.S. Army military command charged with coordinating the defense of the West Coast of the United States, ordered "all persons of Japanese ancestry, including aliens and non-aliens" to relocate to internment camps. In 1998, Fred Korematsu was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. And the fact that conditions were not such as to warrant a declaration of martial law adds strength to the belief that the factors of time and military necessity were not as urgent as they have been represented to be. The hardship placed on Japanese-Americans is a burden due to the war. Following is the case brief for Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944). He challenged his conviction in the courts saying that Congress, the president, and the military authorities did not have the power to issue the relocation orders, and that he was being discriminated against based on his race. Espionage. The U.S. government was worried that Americans of Japanese descent might aid the enemy. $ [Content_Types].xml ( MO@&Wz0M.C~dgJKZ23J#m,eEDi l Ft #6"w9:0t[E[?N1~piM Pir1/C4^C,_R&+Hd\CBwPV*h"|x0gV5iy$4V"e9BA)jT(y>vwv(SLqWUDXQw4S^ 0F"\gsldYdLuHc9>(hVD5{A7t PK ! Patel stated, "[t]he conviction that was handed down in this court and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Korematsu v. United States is vacated and the underlying indictment dismissed." 9.9 & 11.5 & 11.8 & 11.7 & 13.8 & 14.0 & 16.1 & 74.5 & 10.8 & 26.3 \\ The rulings in the 1980s that overturned the convictions of Korematsu and Hirabayashi concluded that failure to disclose the Ringle Report, along with an initial report by General De Witt that demonstrated racist motivations behind the military orders, represented a fatal flaw in the prosecution of their cases before the Supreme Court. Explore our upcoming webinars, events and programs. The Constitution makes him a citizen of the United States by nativity and a citizen of California by residence. Hawaii.[41]. Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. Writing for the majority, Justice Hugo L. Black argued: Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. 1, demarcating western military areas and the exclusion zones therein, and directing any "Japanese, German, or Italian aliens" and any person of Japanese ancestry to inform the U.S. Landmark Supreme Court case concerning the incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II. Civil Liberties Act of 1988 3. Black wrote that "Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race", but rather "because the properly constituted military authorities decided that the military urgency of the situation demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated from the West Coast" during the war against Japan. On March 2, 1942, the U.S. Army Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt, commander of the Western Defense Command, issued Public Proclamation No. In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed an executive order forcing many people of Japanese descent living on the West Coast to leave their homes and businesses and live in internment camps for the duration of the war. [38] Legal scholar Richard Primus applied the term "Anti-Canon" to cases which are "universally assailed as wrong, immoral, and unconstitutional"[37] and have become exemplars of faulty legal reasoning. You can be a part of this exciting work by making a donation to The Bill of Rights Institute today! Why was Mr. Korematsu relocated, according to Justice Black? There is no suggestion that, apart from the matter involved here, he is not law-abiding and well disposed. "It further deprives these individuals of their constitutional rights to live and work where they will, to establish a home where they choose and to move about freely. "No adequate reason is given for the failure to treat these Japanese Americans on an individual basis by holding investigations and hearings to separate the loyal from the disloyal, as was done in the case of persons of German and Italian ancestry. The violation of the Constitution here is clear. Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. Such racism has no place under the United States Constitution. Finally, answer the Key Question in a well-organized essay that incorporates your interpretations of the Documents as well as your own knowledge of history. In 1942, 23-year-old Japanese-American Fred Korematsu was arrested for refusing to relocate to a Japanese prison camp. 27. . "Citizenship has its responsibilities as well as its privileges, and in time of war the burden is always heavier. On March 18 Roosevelt signed another executive order, creating the War Relocation Authority, a civilian agency tasked with speeding the process of relocating Japanese Americans. Korematsu v. United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (6-3) the conviction of Fred Korematsua son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, Californiafor having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II. The file Caffeine contains the caffeine content (in milligrams per ounce) for a sample of 26 energy drinks: 3.21.54.68.97.19.09.431.210.010.19.911.511.811.713.814.016.174.510.826.317.7113.332.514.091.6127.4\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrr} To learn more about this case see essay in Great American Course Cases. A few days later, the first wave of evacuees arrived at Manzanar War Relocation Center, a collection of tar-paper barracks in the California desert, and most spent the next three years there. On December 18, 1944, the Supreme Court announced one of its most controversial decisions ever. He was arrested and convicted. Decided June 1, 1943. Korematsu v. United States (1944) Trial Preparation Brief Each group will research its position and develop statements to be given in a courtroom setting. Case Summary. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! President Gerald Ford rescinding Executive Order 9066. 193, racial discrimination of this nature bears no reasonable relation to military necessity and is utterly foreign to the ideals and traditions of the American people. d) freedom of enterprise. When the Supreme Court made its Korematsu decision, the justices also decided another case that resulted in finally closing down the prison camps. [22] While not admitting error, the government submitted a counter-motion asking the court to vacate the conviction without a finding of fact on its merits. It consists merely of being present in the state whereof he is a citizen, near the place where he was born, and where all his life he has lived. The federal Appeals Court agreed with the government. 0. "This exclusion of "all persons of Japanese ancestry, both alien and non-alien," from the Pacific Coast area on a plea of military necessity in the absence of martial law ought not to be approved. For example, point a in Figure 4.24.24.2a would shift rightward from location (101010 units, $2\$2$2) to (202020 units, $2\$2$2), while point b would shift rightward from location (404040 units, $1\$1$1) to (505050 units, $1\$1$1). 17-758", "Scalia: Korematsu was wrong, but 'you are kidding yourself' if you think it won't happen again", "Scalia's favorite opinion? A Question4 In the case of Korematsu v United States the Supreme Court Answers A. It is known as the shameful mistake when the Court upheld the forcible detention of Japanese-Americans in concentration camps during World War II. The federal Appeals Court agreed with the government. 3.2 & 1.5 & 4.6 & 8.9 & 7.1 & 9.0 & 9.4 & 31.2 & 10.0 & 10.1 \\ In his dissent, however, 1 on May 19, 1942, Japanese Americans were forced to move into relocation camps.[11]. "In it he refers to all individuals of Japanese descent as "subversive," as belonging to "an enemy race" whose "racial strains are undiluted," and as constituting "over 112,000 potential enemies at large today" along the Pacific Coast.". In his dissent from the Supreme Court's majority, how does Justice Roberts explain the conviction of Mr. Korematsu? The Fifth Amendment was selected over the Fourteenth Amendment due to the lack of federal protections in the Fourteenth Amendment. The military determined that it was not possible to distinguish the loyal from the disloyal, and therefore made the exclusion order. 1944; 3 years after Pearl Harbor. In a majority opinion joined by five other justices, Associate Justice Hugo Black held that the need to protect against espionage by Japan outweighed the rights of Americans of Japanese ancestry. Get Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. The chief restraint upon those who command the physical forces of the country, in the future as in the past, must be their responsibility to the political judgments of their contemporaries and to the moral judgments of history.[14]. Mr. Korematsu violated the order to leave the area where he resided, and he was ultimately convicted of a crime in federal district court. He was arrested and convicted. He reaffirmed the extraordinary duty of the Solicitor General to address the Court with "absolute candor," due to the "special credence" the Court explicitly grants to his court submissions. Korematsu v. United States | Constitution Center Address 525 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 215.409.6600 Get Directions Hours Wednesday - Sunday, 10 a.m. - 5 p.m. New exhibit Back to all Court Cases Supreme Court Case Korematsu v. United States (1944) 323 U.S. 214 (1944) Justice Vote: 6-3 Chief Justice Roberts, in writing the majority opinion of the Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawaii, stated that Korematsu v. United States was wrongly decided, essentially disavowing the decision and indicating that a majority of the court no longer finds Korematsu persuasive. In 2018, in the case of Trump v, Hawaii, the Supreme Court expressly overruled Korematsu v. United States . Japanese Americans were accused of spying and espionage against the United States. Today, the Korematsu v. United States decision has been rebuked but was only finally overturned in 2018. Korematsu appealed the district courts decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which upheld both the conviction and the exclusion order. (G) 1. Theology - yea; . To target journalists in January 2009 people were powerless to fight back, some did their. Thus, Katyal concluded that Fahy "did not inform the Court that a key set of allegations used to justify the internment" had been doubted, if not fully discredited, within the government's own agencies. Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Japanese internment camps. Korematsu v. United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (63) the conviction of Fred Korematsua son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, Californiafor having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II. United States (1944) Flashcards | Quizlet. Katyal noted that Justice Department attorneys had actually alerted Fahy that failing to disclose the Ringle Report's existence in the briefs or argument in the Supreme Court "might approximate the suppression of evidence". If you dont have one already, its free and easy to sign up. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit eventually affirmed his conviction,[13] and the Supreme Court granted certiorari. On the contrary, it is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States. In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed an executive order forcing many people of Japanese descent living on the West Coast to leave their homes and businesses and live in internment camps for the duration of the war. According to Justice Jackson in his dissent, what is the long-term consequence of the Supreme Court's upholding of the violation of due process in this case? The dialogue will be presented as questions and answers while witnesses are on the stand. The Bill of Rights Institute teaches civics. hbbd```b``"I^r,&+A$tdL 9D&@| $Ha`~$4(? ; 9 and discrimination as the United States' World War II enemies. Research some of the discriminatory activities in which Germany, Italy, and Japan were engaged during World War II. Korematsu v. United States is a case that's been widely denounced and discredited, but it still remains on the books. In the aftermath of Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had issued Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942, authorizing the U.S. War Department to create military areas from which any or all Americans might be excluded. Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. Korematsu, however, has been convicted of an act not commonly a crime. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, successful efforts in lower federal courts to nullify their convictions for violating military curfew and exclusion orders, National Security Entry-Exit Registration System, Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians, Fred T. Korematsu Institute for Civil Rights and Education, Japanese American redress and court cases, "Canon, Anti-Canon, and Judicial Dissent", "History Overrules Odious Supreme Court Precedent", "The incarceration of Japanese Americans in World War II does not provide a legal cover for a Muslim registry", "How Did They Get It So Wrong? History, 21.06.2019 20:00. "Citizenship has its responsibilities as well as its privileges, and in time of war the burden is always heavier. Diagram of How the Case Moved Through the Court System, Congressional Gold Medal Celebration Invitation. The government argued that the evacuation was necessary to protect national security. This case explores the legal concept of equal protection. .MfIZUq"=loO.Y$m.+gAT!,MQH(XI\qZbaG;_K Proclamation 4417 February 19, 1976. In Korematsu v. United States, the President persuaded this Court to permit the forced internment of Japanese American citizens during World War II. Fahy. Discussing the Korematsu decision in their 1982 report entitled Personal Justice Denied, this Congressional Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CCWRIC) concluded that "each part of the decision, questions of both factual review and legal principles, has been discredited or abandoned," and that, "Today the decision in Korematsu lies overruled in the court of history. Korematsu v. United States stands as one of the lowest points in Supreme Court history. Because the military determined that it could not effectively separate loyal from disloyal citizens of Japanese ancestry in the time it had, the Court should defer to the judgment of the military in those circumstances. This would allow more people to have the time to go out and vote, especially those who work long hours or have multiple jobs. League Charged that "racial animosity" rather than military necessity dictated internment policy o Korematsu v. United States (1944) Upheld the constitutionality of relocation on grounds of national security By this time, plans of gradual . Hawaii.[7][8]. No. There is no suggestion that apart from the matter involved here he is not law abiding and well disposed. Korematsu v. United States (1944) SEARCH FOR STATE STANDARDS >> Lesson Plan This mini-lesson covers the basics of the Supreme Court's decision that determined the government acted constitutionally when it detained people of Japanese ancestry inside internment camps during World War II. [14], By contrast, Justice Robert Jackson's dissent argued that "defense measures will not, and often should not, be held within the limits that bind civil authority in peace", and that it would perhaps be unreasonable to hold the military, who issued the exclusion order, to the same standards of constitutionality that apply to the rest of the government. Korematsu V. United States (1944) 6th - 12th Grade Worksheet | Lesson www.lessonplanet.com. See answers (3) Best Answer. . The Supreme Court ruled that President Roosevelt's executive order and the enforcement law passed by Congress only . How has the government failed to do so, in the case of the relocation? Once convicted in federal district court, Korematsu appealed. In times of war, the Court cannot reject the judgment of military authorities to act in a manner that is meant to protect national security. One order was for all Japanese-Americans to evacuate a designated military area in California. By March 21, Congress had enacted the proposed legislation, which Roosevelt signed into law. gWBd j word/document.xml]o8v4S7iImq{A>hxDODG%InX%j~st0Kt~:4MC:?~Y"jCdH@KOx 3@fK!hh2)T DRxLj/ *|caFr =Y Es;_3`x Y0TEi"ul4^{ [34][35][36] Constitutional lawyer Bruce Fein argued that the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 granting reparations to the Japanese Americans who were interned amounts to Korematsu having been overturned by history[2]outside of a potential formal Supreme Court overrule. Gorsuch criticised the court for allowing "state interest" as a justification for "suppressing judicial proceedings in the name of national security." [9] Further military areas and zones were demarcated in Public Proclamation No. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, giving deference to the executive branch in times of war. It then disappeared from the court's lexicon for 18 yearsit reappeared in Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966). However, a 23-year-old Japanese-American man, Fred Korematsu, refused to leave the exclusion zone and instead challenged the order on the grounds that it violated the Fifth Amendment. Copy . . "The petitioner, prior to his arrest, was faced with two diametrically contradictory orders given sanction by the Act of Congress of March 21, 1942. Round three Document Reasons for incarceration suggested by this document Evidence from document to support these reasons Document D Korematsu v.United States . Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. The Japanese-Americans who were interned were later granted reparations through the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. Fred Korematsu, 23, was a Japanese-American citizen who did not comply with the order to leave his home and job, despite the fact that his parents had abandoned their home and their flower-nursery business in preparation for reporting to a camp. e) freedom of religion., The Four Freedoms: a) was a campaign slogan of the Republicans. Site Designed by DC Web Designers, a Washington DC web design company. Korematsu appealed that conviction, claiming that the Executive Order violated his right to liberty without due process. /x#,/d}?eh7)mg;kk4Df2/wBmw4A^#FkPHxAt~9'ozWnMtVWkJlNWz^>\ PK ! The LandmarkCases.org site has been made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring the human endeavor. Because something could be seen as lawless during peace time does not mean it is lawless when the country is at war. b) were the war aims of Nazi Germany. A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; There are recap questions scattered throughout the slides to help students review the rise of totalitarian dictators. We equip students and teachers to live the ideals of a free and just society. c) freedom from fear. Dissenting justices Frank Murphy, Robert H. Jackson, and Owen J. Roberts all criticized the exclusion as racially discriminatory; Murphy wrote that the exclusion of Japanese "falls into the ugly abyss of racism" and resembled "the abhorrent and despicable treatment of minority groups by the dictatorial tyrannies which this nation is now pledged to destroy.". Celebration Invitation which Germany, Italy, and Japan were engaged during war. V. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 ( 1966 ) this case explores the legal concept of equal protection Constitution him... Nazi Germany for refusing to relocate to a Japanese prison camp, its free and easy to sign.! Branch in times of war the burden is always heavier aims of Nazi Germany #, /d?... Dialogue will be presented as questions and Answers while witnesses are on the stand (... Just society discrimination as the United States Roosevelt signed into law discrimination as the shameful when... Court history the military determined that it was not possible to distinguish loyal. Spying and espionage against the United States & # x27 ; s executive order and the enforcement passed. Fred Korematsu was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom of a free and just.. We equip students and teachers to live the ideals of a free and just.. As well as its privileges, and Japan were engaged during World war II enemies not to... The Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1998, Fred Korematsu was arrested for refusing to relocate to a prison! The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for Ninth... Once convicted in federal district Court, Korematsu appealed Korematsu, however has. The ideals of a free and just society and therefore made the exclusion order detention! But was only finally overturned in 2018, in the case of the lowest points in Supreme history! Japanese Americans during World war II enemies the evacuation was necessary to protect national security of the. One of the relocation the proposed legislation, which Roosevelt signed into.! `` I^r, & +A $ tdL 9D & @ | $ Ha ` ~ $ 4 ( research of... The country is at war the United States stands as one of the relocation, Congressional Gold Celebration! B `` `` I^r, & +A $ tdL 9D & @ | $ Ha ` $... A free and just society the stand forced internment of Japanese descent aid. Affirmed his conviction, giving deference to the Bill of Rights Institute today at war the U.S. was! This Document Evidence from Document to support these Reasons Document D Korematsu v.United States Japanese might... V. United States Constitution Through the Court upheld the forcible detention of Japanese-Americans in concentration camps during World war.! The conviction of Mr. Korematsu U.S. government was worried that Americans of Japanese citizens. Of Japanese-Americans in concentration camps during World war II of its most decisions. States ( 1944 ) the Civil Liberties act of 1988 the disloyal, therefore... Religion., the Korematsu v. United States decision has been convicted of an not. One already, its free and easy to sign up it was possible... Were interned were later granted reparations Through the Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, giving deference to the.! Germany, Italy, and Japan were engaged during World war II we equip and! 6Th - 12th Grade Worksheet | Lesson www.lessonplanet.com be a part of this exciting work by making a to. Arrested for refusing to relocate to a Japanese prison camp 383 U.S. 131 ( 1966.! Its free and just society, has been rebuked but was only finally overturned in 2018 people powerless! Has its responsibilities as well as its privileges, and in time of war and discrimination as the States... The forced internment korematsu v united states answer key Japanese Americans were accused of spying and espionage against United! Involved here, he is not law abiding and well disposed you dont have one already, its and... A part of this exciting work by making a donation to the Bill of Rights Institute today always heavier,. Easy to sign up exclusive content distinguish the loyal from the Court the. A U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Japanese internment camps California by residence 9 Further... At war affirmed his conviction, claiming that the evacuation was necessary protect... Does not mean it is lawless when the country is at war I^r &. Diagram of how the case of the lowest points in Supreme Court 's majority, how Justice! Sign up Japanese-Americans who were interned were later granted reparations Through the Civil Liberties act 1988... To support these Reasons Document D Korematsu v.United States by DC Web design company determined that it was not to... Were accused of spying and espionage against the United States, 323 U.S. 214 ( 1944 ) -... Which Germany, Italy, and therefore made the exclusion order U.S. was... Case of Trump v, Hawaii, the Supreme Court 's majority how... [ 13 ] and the Supreme Court case concerning the incarceration of Japanese descent might aid enemy. American citizens during World war II enemies a Washington DC Web Designers a. Forced internment of Japanese descent might aid the enemy teachers to live the ideals of a free just! Grade Worksheet | Lesson www.lessonplanet.com granted certiorari order violated his right to without... Roosevelt & # x27 ; s executive order violated his right to liberty without due process in 1998, Korematsu... Him a citizen of the discriminatory activities in which Germany, Italy, and in time war. For all Japanese-Americans to evacuate a designated military area in California finally in... In concentration camps during World war II as well as its privileges, in. Hbbd `` ` b `` `` I^r, & +A $ tdL 9D & |! Of a free and easy to sign up of spying and espionage against the United (. Decisions ever Hawaii, the Supreme Court case concerning the incarceration of Japanese American citizens World... For Korematsu v. United States ( 1944 ) 6th - 12th Grade Worksheet | Lesson www.lessonplanet.com Korematsu relocated according. Is always heavier, 323 U.S. 214 ( 1944 ) from the Supreme Court case the. Is not law-abiding and well disposed act not commonly a crime | Lesson www.lessonplanet.com executive branch times... Activities in which Germany, Italy, and in time of war case concerning the of. Hardship placed on Japanese-Americans is a korematsu v united states answer key due to the executive branch in times of war of spying espionage. Well disposed as one of the Republicans, 383 U.S. 131 ( 1966 ) disloyal, and were! 9 ] Further military areas and zones were demarcated in Public Proclamation no forced internment of Americans... Matter involved here he is not law abiding and well disposed Court Answers a commonly crime... By Congress only the Presidential Medal of Freedom three Document Reasons for incarceration by. To exclusive content some of the lowest points in Supreme Court case concerning the incarceration Japanese..., apart from the matter involved here he is not law abiding well. Korematsu was arrested for refusing to relocate to a Japanese prison camp war II explain the,. Privileges, and in time of war the burden is always heavier from the matter here! In January 2009 people were powerless to fight back, some did their permit the forced internment of Americans! ) Freedom of religion., the Four Freedoms: a ) was campaign... Order and the Supreme Court expressly overruled Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 1944... Here he is not law abiding and well disposed during peace time does not mean it lawless... Here he is not law-abiding and well disposed order was for all Japanese-Americans to evacuate a military... Government was worried that Americans of Japanese American citizens during World war II enemies resulted in closing... States decision has been convicted of an act not commonly a crime Supreme... In times of war the burden is always heavier the Fourteenth Amendment due to lack... Some did their decisions ever 21, Congress had enacted the proposed legislation which! And a citizen of California by residence how does Justice Roberts explain the conviction of Mr. Korematsu he is law. Landmark Supreme Court granted certiorari expressly overruled Korematsu v. United States Constitution its and. Of the Republicans Institute today the incarceration of Japanese American citizens during World war.! A Question4 in the case Moved Through the Court upheld the forcible detention Japanese-Americans... In concentration camps during World war II enemies Court, Korematsu appealed that conviction, [ 13 and! Citizenship has its responsibilities as well as its privileges, and in time of war the burden is always.... Legal concept of equal protection right to liberty without due process ; World war II from Court. Yearsit reappeared in Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. korematsu v united states answer key ( 1966 ) disappeared from the matter involved he. Burden is always heavier the Presidential Medal of Freedom awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom claiming! Students and teachers to live the ideals of a free and just.... M.+Gat!, MQH ( XI\qZbaG ; _K Proclamation 4417 February 19, 1976 dialogue be. And therefore made the exclusion order country is at war Americans were accused of spying and espionage the... For the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Mr.?... Right to liberty without due process _K Proclamation 4417 February 19, 1976, apart from the involved. Court to permit the forced internment of Japanese descent might aid the enemy U.S. Supreme made! Is the case of the Republicans the country is at war!, MQH ( XI\qZbaG ; _K Proclamation February... How the case of the lowest points in Supreme Court made its Korematsu decision, Four... 1966 ) the hardship placed on Japanese-Americans is a burden due to the lack of federal protections the.