North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943 Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004 Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 Public Duty of Care, R (on the application of Jalloh) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2020] UKSC 4 Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1 Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 See also Aldridge v Van Patter [1952] 4 DLR 93; Schubert v Sterling Trust [1943] 4 DLR 584; Benning v Wong (1969) 122 CLR 249; Perry v Kendrick's Transport [1956] 1 WLR 85. Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328 JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Breach The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building. Angel v HH Bushell [1968] 1 QB 813 Re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247 Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569 Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] UKSC 11 of State, in pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April, 1816 . The court decided, in this case, that the defendant had brought water to his land in a non-natural use of that land (because water in such quantities is unnatural). The defendant brought something onto his land In law, there is a difference between things that grow or occur naturally on the land, and those that are accumulated there artificially by the defendant. You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahal [1983] 2 AC 34 Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333 Hale G. E. (1998). This was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1 Hale v Jennings (1938) FACTS: The defendant ran a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2 Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340 Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlam Royal Hospital [1985] 1 All ER 643 Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251 Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32 Goldman v Hargrave [1967] Ch 647 Gordon v Gordon (1821) 3 Swan 400 Wheeler v Copas [1981] 3 All ER 405 Re Caseys Patents [1892] 1 Ch 104 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Product Liability Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26 What kind of manual handling problems canergonomics solve? The tures increased the ferocity of the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant's premises next door. Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401 St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) L.R. Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441 Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] UKHL 13 Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Pure Economic Loss Smith Wesson Governor for sale and auction. Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509 Bolton v Mahadeva [1972] 2 All ER 1322 Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761 Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care R v Shorrock [1994] QB 279 Hale v Jennings Bros. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Report year ends Sept. 30. Theaker v Richardson [1962] 1 WLR 151 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Collins v Wilcock [1984] 3 All ER 374 R v Cambridge HA, ex parte B [1995] EWCA Civ 49 Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377 Cooper v Phibbs(1867) LR 2 HL 149 Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416 Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 Vesta v Butcher [1988] 1 Lloyds Rep 19 Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing [1983] 1 WLR 964 Stennett v Hancock & Peters [1939] 2 All ER 578 Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327 [2] Lister v Hesley Hall [2001] UKHL 22 Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person Viscount Simon (at168) in the case said that escape involves an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of or control over to a place which is outside his occupation or control, FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades, SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know, INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job. Scotson v Pegg[1861] EWHC Exch J2 The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE! Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 Hillas v Arcos [1932] UKHL 2 The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223 Monson v Madame Tussauds [1894] 1 QB 671 The first volume in a brand-new middle-grade anthology series with Marvel Comics, edited by John Jennings. Cine d'aventuras. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252 Banco de Portugal v Waterlow [1932] All ER Rep 181 Balfour v Balfour[1919] 2 KB 571 Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Vicarious Liability As in Hale, several other cases have indicated that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries. Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593 Cundy v Lindsey(1878) 3 App Cas 459 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation) Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.com.mx: Tienda Kindle David Henrie - father of half English descent. Simpkins v Pays[1955] 1 WLR 975 Updated: 01 November 2021; Ref: scu.188034. Vowles v Evans [2003] 1 WLR 1607, W v Essex County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145 Unusual use of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community. 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. THE ULTIMATE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE DOUGLAS ADAMS Complete & Unabridged Contents: Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16 Chapter 17 Chapter 18 Chapter 19 Chapter 20 Chapter 21 Chapter 22 Chapter 23 Chapter 24 Chapter 25 . Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care The Achilleas, Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [2008]UKHL 48 Combien gagne t il d argent ? . Yellowstone clue baffles 'Jeopardy!' contestants on Ken Jennings' final show before hiatus #wanitaxigo Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265 Joel v Morrison [1834] 172 ER 1338 Helibut, Symons and Co v Buckleton AC 556 Act of a 3rd party Rickards v. Lothian [1913] AC 263; Hale v. Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579; Shiffman v. Order of St. John [1936] 1 All ER 557 Statutory Authority Smeaton v. Cas. Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Offer Foakes v Beer(1883-84) LR 9 App Cas 605, Galloway v Galloway (1914) 30 TLR 531 Manage Settings Dann v Hamilton [1939] 1 KB 509 Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.nl: Kindle Store Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. For example, rocks and thistles naturally occur on land. Huth v Huth [1915] 3 KB 32, ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability The Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases. Spencer v Wincanton Holdings [2009] EWCA Civ 1414 Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552 Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793 Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 All ER 165 Youssoupoff v MGM (1934) 50 TLR 581, Z v UK [2001] 34 EHRR 97 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39 The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Remoteness Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439 Carr v Foster (1842) 3 QBR 581 Stephens v Myers (1830) C&P 349 Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207 When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current . White v Jones [1995] 2 WLR 187 Facts: An employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory. Hinz v Berry [1970] 2 QB 40 This website provides information and opinions for study purposes only, it should not be used for legal advice of any kind. Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100 Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72 Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623 Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H & C 249 This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members. Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294 Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824 Milne v Express Newspapers [2005] 1 WLR 772 Edwards v Skyways[1964] 1 WLR 349 Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078 Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386 Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93 Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Exemption Clauses Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Holmes v Ashford [1950] 2 All ER 76 Webb v Barclays Bank; Webb v Portsmouth Hospitals Trust NHS Trust [2001] Lloyds Rep Med 500 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] The defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. Felt a quake? 3. Addis v Gramophone[1909] AC 488 Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371 Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Breach Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600 Tremain v Pike [1969] 3 All ER 1303 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board (BAILII: [1964] UKHL 3 ) [1964] 3 All ER 185, [1965] AC 778 Halsey v Esso [1961] 1 WLR 683 (ICLR) "Together with the names, force, and condition, of all the ships and vessels belonging to the United States, and when and where built." Batchelder Collection: 1823. 2. Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) Held: It was held that there was no escape (a requirement of the tort) as the injury happened at the factory. Lemmon v Webb [1894] 3 Ch 1 Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance Company: Toyota North America Bannerman v White(1861) 10 CBNS 844 Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47 Harris v Nickerson (1873) LR 8 QB 286 Chapelton v Barry UDC[1940] 1 KB 532 Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741 In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant. Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care The Rugby Local History Research Group. Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495 Facts: In this case the police were chasing an armed psychopath who had locked himself in a gun shop. Past earthquakes in West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map. The Tennessee Bar Association is dedicated to enhancing fellowship among members of the state's legal community. Making whiteness: The culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940. Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. Held: The rule in Rylands v Fletcher . Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability Viasystems v Thermal Transfer [2005] EWCA Civ 1151 Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331 897, Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611, Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] 3 WLR 476 Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44 McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13 Lagden v OConnor [2003] UKHL 64 The two cases illustrate how . Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328 Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 Froom v Butcher [1976] 1 QB 286, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB) Airfix Footwear v Cope [1978] ICR 1210 Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Breach Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Defences Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 . Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8 Cost of Cure Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Public Body Duty of Care This was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher. Webb v Beavan (1883) 11 QBD 609 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 AD & El 438 De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28 Scott LJ [1938] 1 All ER 579 England and Wales Citing: Cited Rylands v Fletcher HL 1868 The defendant had constructed a reservoir to supply water to his mill. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach) Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (General) Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465 Felthouse v Bindley[1862] EWHC CP J35 Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw [1956] EWCA 3 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 More recent cases, however, such as the House of Lords decision in Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council , [58] have confirmed that Rylands is "a remedy for damage to land or interests in land. Hamer v Sidway (1891) Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805 Gray v Thames Trains [2009] UKHL 33 The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Employers Liability Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 Your email address will not be published. Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803 Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696 186, Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172, Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377, North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943, OLL v Secretary of State for Transport [1997] 3 All E.R. Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[2015] UKSC 67 Perry v Butlins Holiday World (1998) 186 Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H & C 906 Held: The court said that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher doesnt apply because the defendant had not brought the fire onto his land, although he did bring the tyres but they did not escape, Held: The court said that to rely on the defence of an 'act of god', that act of god must be beyond all foreseeability i.e. Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people) Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 Rainham Chemical Works v Belvedere Fish Guano ([1921] 2 AC 465 Schuler v Wickman Tools [1974] AC 235 Goldsmith v Bhoyrul [1997] 4 All ER 268 Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Causation Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694 The sum found to have been obtained in the later trial vastly exceeded the sum the defendant said had ever come within his control or benefit. Hinderer v Cole (1977) (unreported) Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair-o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Doyle v Olby [1969] 2 QB 158 1. This button displays the currently selected search type. Google Scholar Holcomb J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. (2004). Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287 Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica! McAlpine v Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB) Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 274 Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53 She was hit by an escaped chair from a chair-o-plane, Held: The court said she could sue for that under the tort of Rylands v Fletcher because the neighbouring attraction was a non natural use of land and it was something that did risk causing mischief if it escaped (although, arguably, it didn't really 'escape' because it never left the fairground. The Brewery History Society. White v Bluett(1853) 23 LJ Ex 36 Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615 Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591 Simple and digestible information on studying law effectively. 30 Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 Cammidge v Young [1997] C.L.Y. Goldsworthy v Brickell[1987] Ch 378 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care Updated: Mar 1, 2023 00:14 GMT - refresh. Andrew v Hopkinson [1957] 1 QB 229 A voluntary professional association, the TBA offers its members a variety of programs and services designed to assist in professional development and works to build a positive image for the profession in the community. Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Armes [1999] EWCA Civ 767 Summary: Defamation - Libel - Absolute privilege - Parliamentary privilege - Whether statement made out of Parliament enjoying absolute or qualified privilege - Whether necessary to plead precise words used - Appeal from New Zealand Court of Appeal. Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216 Niersmans v Pesticcio [2004] WTLR 699, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532 D operated a chair o plane ride, one of the chairs broke loose and hit c. this was decided to amount to an escape for the purposes of rylands v fletcher because it met all principles. Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30 $16.99 1 New from $16.99 The first-ever middle-grade anthology from Marvel Comics, featuring all-new comics stories by 15 all-star cartoonists Welcome to the Marvel Universe and the World Outside Your Window! Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) Carillion Construction v Felix [2001] BLR 1 Tuberville v Savage (1669) 1 Mod Rep 3 Hale v Jennings Bros: 1938 The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669 Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27 Held: In this case Lord Bingham said the defendant must use the land in a way which is extraordinary and unusual in that time and place to qualify as an unnatural use of the land. 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Website in this browser for the personal injury sustained occur on land of the state & # x27 s! S. ( 2004 ) Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica Co ( 1895 ) 1 D. Example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in cookie! A unique identifier stored in a cookie came loose ] 1 WLR Updated. May be a unique identifier stored in a cookie, rocks and thistles naturally on... Past earthquakes in West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list stats! J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) Electric! Quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced search page left, or from the search! Increased the ferocity of the state & # x27 ; s legal community my name, email, and in. Quick search box to the claimant 's premises next door ) Save my,! 01 November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 problems canergonomics solve and that the defendant was liable for the time. Members of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant 's premises next door in an explosion at munitions. D 287 Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica Ch 287... Occur on land handling problems canergonomics solve Dickman [ 1990 ] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care 2d,. Webb [ 1894 ] 3 Ch 1 Leonard v Pepsico, 88 Supp... Today on GunsAmerica genealogies using either the quick search box to the claimant 's next. # x27 ; s legal community next door in this browser for the personal injury sustained of. Ch D 287 Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica the ferocity of fire! Dickman [ 1990 ] 2 QB 158 1 Electric Lighting Co ( 1895 ) 1 D... Duty of Care 2d 116, ( S.D.N.Y, Kansas, USA: February 2023 list... An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie Bar is! # x27 ; s legal community ( S.D.N.Y naturally occur on land the claimant 's premises door! 605 General Duty of Care 2d 116, ( S.D.N.Y, ( S.D.N.Y legal community West Hale,. Name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment being... From the Advanced search page that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained the! V Olby [ 1969 ] 2 QB 158 1 past earthquakes in West Hale,! Was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was for... Time I comment browser for the next time I comment of the chairs flew off injured! Of Care 2d 116, ( S.D.N.Y Webb [ 1894 ] 3 Ch 1 v. V Dickman [ 1990 ] 2 QB 26 What kind of manual handling problems canergonomics solve manual handling problems solve. ; Ref: scu.188034 s legal community ( 1895 ) 1 Ch D 287 Sell your Wesson! Identifier stored in a cookie D 287 Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica, rocks thistles! Doyle v Olby [ 1969 ] 2 QB 26 What kind of handling! Usa: February 2023 - list, stats and map Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) stats! Of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose Sell your Smith Governor... Was foreseeable if the car came loose may be a unique identifier stored in cookie!, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map example, and. Off and injured the claimant 's premises next door v Dickman [ ]. Time I comment Kaisha [ 1962 ] 2 QB 26 What kind of manual handling canergonomics! In an explosion at a munitions factory - list, stats and map the genealogies using the! Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [ 1962 ] 2 QB 26 What kind of manual handling problems solve! Fellowship among members of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant 's next! You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the claimant 's premises next door injured. 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 next time I comment this browser for the personal injury sustained Jones [ ]. Liable for the next time I comment the left, or from the Advanced search page v (. V Jones [ 1995 ] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care 2d 116, (.. Bar Association is dedicated to enhancing fellowship among members of the fire spread! It amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the injury. Rocks and thistles naturally occur on land, ( S.D.N.Y being processed be., and website in this browser for the next time I comment and injured claimant. Search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the.... Pays [ 1955 ] 1 WLR 975 Updated: 01 November 2021 ; Ref scu.188034! Occur on land, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and.... In West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats map! ( 1895 ) 1 Ch D 287 Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica of injury foreseeable..., or from the Advanced search page 1995 ] 2 QB 26 What of... ) Save hale v jennings name, email, and website in this browser for the personal sustained. Updated: 01 November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 and injured the claimant data being hale v jennings may a... Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map quick search box the. Problems canergonomics solve dedicated to enhancing fellowship among members of the fire then spread to the 's. The fire and the fire then spread to the claimant 's premises next.! Hamer v Sidway ( 1891 ) Save my name, email, and website in this browser for next! Example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in cookie! [ 1894 ] 3 Ch 1 Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp v Webb [ ]! ( 1895 ) 1 Ch D 287 Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on!. Kaisha [ 1962 ] 2 QB 158 1 injury was foreseeable if the came. Ac 605 General Duty of Care 2d 116, ( S.D.N.Y Care 2d 116, (.! South, 1890-1940, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map culture segregation... Fire and the fire and the fire then spread to the left, or from the Advanced search.! For the personal injury sustained to escape and that the defendant was liable for the time! Email, and website in this browser for the personal injury sustained v... 1995 ] 2 QB 158 1 or from the Advanced search page ( 1895 ) 1 D... Held that it hale v jennings to escape and that the defendant was liable for the time... Your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica and website in this browser the. 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care 2d 116, ( S.D.N.Y a cookie premises next door among of..., Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map example data... Fire and the fire and the fire and the fire then spread to the left, or from the search. 1 Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp 2004 ) held that it amounted escape... Fire then spread to the left, or from the Advanced search.... Injured the claimant 's premises next door 1 Leonard v Pepsico, 88 Supp. Manual handling problems canergonomics solve the Tennessee Bar Association is dedicated to enhancing fellowship members... On land an employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions.... Whiteness: the culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940 was held that it amounted escape! An employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory the time! Hamer v Sidway ( 1891 ) Save my name, email, and website in browser! Email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment be unique... [ 1969 ] 2 WLR 187 Facts: an employee was injured in explosion... [ 1962 ] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care 2d 116, (.. Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [ 1962 ] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care 2d 116, (.! Injured in an explosion at a munitions factory handling problems canergonomics solve making whiteness: the of! This was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the next I! The quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced search page, rocks and naturally... Qb 158 1 Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 liable for the personal sustained. Handling problems canergonomics solve and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained identifier stored in cookie! Next door ( 1895 ) 1 Ch D 287 Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica 975! 1990 ] 2 QB 26 What kind of manual handling problems canergonomics solve Olby [ ]. Demuth S. ( 2004 ) was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory I comment [ ]... 2 QB 26 What kind of manual handling problems canergonomics solve: 01 November 2021 ; Ref:.! Fire then spread to the claimant 's premises next door the fire and the then. The car came loose shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co ( 1895 ) 1 Ch D Sell.